Skip to content
Learn
Sign up

Quantitative Methods & RiskProbability & Distributions for Traders

Volatility Clustering & Regimes

12 min read

Volatility has a memory

If returns themselves are close to unpredictable, their magnitudes are not. Large moves tend to be followed by large moves, of either sign, and quiet periods by quiet periods. This is volatility clustering, first documented by Mandelbrot in 1963, and it is one of the most robust empirical facts in all of finance. It is why a single daily σ estimate is misleading: volatility is a moving target with calm regimes and stormy regimes.

Volatility clustering

Term

The tendency of high-volatility days to bunch together and low-volatility days to bunch together. Returns are roughly uncorrelated, but absolute or squared returns are strongly positively autocorrelated. Models like GARCH exist precisely to capture this.

Formula

Square-root-of-time scaling (and its fine print)

σ_T = σ_1 · √T
Note

EWMA: weight recent vol more heavily

A simple way to track a moving volatility target is an exponentially weighted moving average of squared returns: σ²_t = λ·σ²_{t−1} + (1−λ)·r²_{t−1}. RiskMetrics popularised λ = 0.94 for daily data, which gives recent days more influence and adapts quickly when a calm regime breaks. GARCH(1,1) generalises this by adding a long-run mean the vol reverts to.

Formula

EWMA volatility update

σ²_t = λ · σ²_{t−1} + (1 − λ) · r²_{t−1}
94/100
80/10099/100

At λ = 0.94, the effective lookback is ~17 days and the half-life (where a day's weight has halved) is ~11.2 days. Lower λ reacts faster to a new volatility regime but is noisier; higher λ is smoother but slower to recognise that the market has changed.

Heads up

Clustering breaks √T and breaks VaR

Because volatility clusters, a 10-day VaR scaled from a calm-period 1-day VaR using √10 will badly understate risk if the next 10 days land in a storm. The 2008 and 2020 risk-model failures were, in large part, failures to recognise that the volatility regime had shifted under the model's feet.

Calm vs. stormy regime — 60-day forward sim80 paths · 60 steps · μ=0 σ=0.02

Terminal distribution

Same drift, doubled volatility (σ = 2%/day) versus a calm 1% regime widens the terminal distribution by exactly the vol ratio. Notice how a higher-vol regime fattens the tails of the outcome distribution even with identical drift — risk, not return, is what moved.

Knowledge check

Daily volatility is 1.5%. Under the standard i.i.d. assumption, what is the approximate annualized volatility?